Why He Tarries

Part I — The Tarrying

Country living and the third angel in verity

Part 1 of 4Sections 1–2 of 8≈32 minKJV throughout

1. He Might Have Come — the Delay Was Ours

The kingdom poised to appear — held back — Luke 19:11; Matt. 24:14:

  • Luke 19:11. "they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear" — the frame: the advent was poised to come quickly, and Christ answered the expectation with a parable of a nobleman gone "into a far country," a parable of delay. Something held the kingdom back.
    • the tarrying = the prolonging of the time before the advent (the term Scripture and the parables use for the genuine prolonging), charged not to God but to His people's unreadiness — the bridegroom tarries while the virgins slumber (Matt. 25:5), the wicked servant says "My lord delayeth" (Matt. 24:48), yet the Lord is "not slack" but longsuffering (2 Pet. 3:9), and the day may be "hasted" by readiness (2 Pet. 3:12); even the vision "tarries" only to the waiting, for in truth "it will not tarry" (Hab. 2:3). Defined in full in the Symbol Dictionary.
  • Matt. 24:14. "this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come" — the condition on which the timing turns: a finished gospel work. "And then shall the end come" makes the advent contingent on the church's completion of its appointed task.
  • WitnessDA 633.3. White: "By giving the gospel to the world it is in our power to hasten our Lord's return... Had the church of Christ done her appointed work as the Lord ordained, the whole world would before this have been warned, and the Lord Jesus would have come to our earth in power and great glory" — the master statement: it weaves Matt. 24:14 ("then shall the end come"), 2 Pet. 3:12 margin ("hasting"), and the plain charge that the church's unfinished work, not God, holds back the advent. Christ "would have come" already.

The lie that licenses delay — "My lord delayeth" — Matt. 24:48-51; 25:5:

  • Matt. 24:48. "if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming" — the wicked servant locates the delay in his own heart, not in the Lord. "My lord delayeth his coming" is the inward charge against God that licenses unwatchfulness.
  • Matt. 24:49-51. "shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken... The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him" — the fruit of believing the delay is cruelty and worldliness; the very servant who said "My lord delayeth" is overtaken, for readiness, not the date, was the issue.
  • Matt. 25:5. "While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept" — the tarrying defined: a real prolonging of the time before the advent, during which both wise and foolish slept. The bridegroom tarries; the failure is the virgins' lack of oil, not His unfaithfulness.
  • WitnessPREX2 242.1. Litch, on Matt. 24:48-51: "One would hardly think it possible for those ministers of the gospel who say, not in their hearts only, but with their lips, 'My Lord delayeth his coming,' to read this terrible warning, and not tremble... Will not ministers see that they are literally joining hands with the drunken and vicious of all degrees, while they say My Lord delayeth his coming?" — the pioneer exposition: the "My Lord delayeth" attitude is the sin of the unwatchful servant, locating the delay in the heart of the unfaithful, never in the Lord.
  • WitnessAJB 296.4. Bates, on the Advent movement: "in every important move they make, their history is likened, or compared to the history of the ten virgins in the parable, namely, 'tarry of the vision,' 'tarry of the bridegroom,' midnight cry, 'Behold the bridegroom cometh,' etc." — those who lived the tarrying time read Matt. 25:5 and Hab. 2:3 directly onto their own experience; the "tarrying" was named by the people it tested.

God flatly denies slackness — the delay is mercy — 2 Pet. 3:9, 12, 15:

  • 2 Pet. 3:9. "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" — God denies slackness outright. The lengthening of probation is mercy, not failure of promise; the delay is on man's account, accommodated by God's longsuffering.
  • 2 Pet. 3:12. "Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God" — the day of God can be "hasted" by His people. The margin reads "hasting" (DA 633.3 cites "2 Peter 3:12, margin"), making the saints' readiness a true factor in the timing — the counter-truth to the wicked servant's "delayeth."
  • 2 Pet. 3:15. "account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation" — the delay reinterpreted: the longsuffering IS salvation. What looks like slowness is God holding the door open for souls, charged to His mercy, never to indifference.

Scripture's own paradox — "though it tarry... it will not tarry" — Hab. 2:3; Heb. 10:36-37; Acts 3:19-20:

  • Hab. 2:3. "the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry" — Scripture's own paradox of the tarrying: it has an appointed time and yet is endured as if delayed; the call is to wait in faith, not to charge the Lord with slackness.
  • Heb. 10:36-37. "ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise. For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry" — the promise follows the doing of God's will. "He that shall come will come, and will not tarry" answers the wicked servant: the tarrying is in us, not in Him.
  • Acts 3:19-20. "Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; And he shall send Jesus Christ" — repentance and conversion bring the times of refreshing, and "he shall send Jesus Christ." The return of the Lord is linked to His people's spiritual condition; the delay turns on readiness.

The type of the delay — eleven days made forty years — Num. 14:33-34; Deut. 1:2-3; 1 Cor. 10:11:

  • Num. 14:33-34. "your children shall wander in the wilderness forty years... After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year, shall ye bear your iniquities... and ye shall know my breach of promise" — the type of the delay: forty years of wandering imposed by unbelief, a year for a day. "My breach of promise" was Israel's making, not God's — the avoidable lengthening of their probation in the wilderness.
    • the delay = the avoidable lengthening of probation, the "long years" that might have been spared (the avoidable, typological lengthening that need not have been — distinct from the tarrying in that it could have been spared), typified by Israel's wilderness wandering — eleven days' journey became forty years (Deut. 1:2-3) because of unbelief; the "breach of promise" was Israel's making (Num. 14:33-34); written "for our admonition" (1 Cor. 10:11), it pictures a finished gospel work held back (Matt. 24:14), so the end which "should immediately appear" (Luke 19:11) was prolonged by the church, not by God. Defined in full in the Symbol Dictionary.
  • Deut. 1:2. "(There are eleven days' journey from Horeb by the way of mount Seir unto Kadeshbarnea.)" — the measure of the loss: the distance to Canaan was eleven days; the forty years were entirely the wages of unbelief.
  • Deut. 1:3. "in the fortieth year, in the eleventh month, on the first day of the month, that Moses spake unto the children of Israel" — "in the fortieth year," set against the eleven-day journey of v. 2, the gap (40 years vs. 11 days) is the exact Scriptural picture of how readiness, not God, determines the length of the wilderness.
  • 1 Cor. 10:11. "all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come" — Paul makes Israel's wandering a direct admonition to the last-day church. The forty-year delay is written so we will not repeat it; the type is for us.
  • WitnessGC 458.1. White: "It was not the will of God that Israel should wander forty years in the wilderness... In like manner, it was not the will of God that the coming of Christ should be so long delayed... But unbelief separated them from God... In mercy to the world, Jesus delays His coming, that sinners may have an opportunity to hear the warning and find in Him a shelter" — the exact Israel-to-advent parallel this section owns: the forty-year delay and the long delay of the advent both spring from unbelief, while the present delay is God's mercy (2 Pet. 3:9, 15) toward sinners.
  • WitnessEv 696.3. White: "Charge It Not to God—We may have to remain here in this world because of insubordination many more years, as did the children of Israel; but for Christ's sake, His people should not add sin to sin by charging God with the consequence of their own wrong course of action" (Letter 184, 1901) — the wilderness parallel (Num. 14:33-34) made personal: the delay is "insubordination," and the charge against God is forbidden.

The dated witness Scripture cannot supply — 1844 and the message refused — 8T 115.5; 1SM 68.1:

  • Witness8T 115.5. White: "In the great disappointment of 1844 the faith of His people was tested as was that of the Hebrews at the Red Sea... If all who had labored unitedly in the work of 1844 had received the third angel's message and proclaimed it in the power of the Holy Spirit... Years ago the inhabitants of the earth would have been warned, the closing work would have been completed, and Christ would have come for the redemption of His people" — the dated testimony Scripture cannot give: the delay tied concretely to 1844 and the church's failure to proclaim the third angel's message. The text marks the testing at the Red Sea (the 1844 disappointment), distinct from the forty-year wandering that types the delay itself.
  • Witness1SM 68.1. White: "Had Adventists, after the great disappointment in 1844, held fast their faith, and followed on unitedly in the opening providence of God, receiving the message of the third angel... the work would have been completed, and Christ would have come ere this to receive His people to their reward" — a second dated witness fixing the avoidable delay to the post-1844 unfaithfulness of Adventists. "Christ would have come ere this" makes the lengthening of probation the church's account, not God's.
  • WitnessEv 694.3. White, under "The Reason for the Delay": "Had the purpose of God been carried out by His people in giving to the world the message of mercy, Christ would, ere this, have come to the earth, and the saints would have received their welcome into the city of God" (6T 450, 1900) — light reinforcement of the avoidable lengthening: the work "might have been done," and Christ "would, ere this, have come," confirming Matt. 24:14's condition on a finished work of mercy.

For Discussion

  1. The wicked servant says "My lord delayeth his coming" (Matt. 24:48) — a lie told first in his heart — and the bridegroom truly "tarried" (Matt. 25:5); yet "the Lord is not slack" but "longsuffering... not willing that any should perish" (2 Pet. 3:9). How can the delay be both real and entirely the fault of His people, with no slackness in God? What does it mean for us that the same servant who charged the Lord with delay was the one overtaken (Matt. 24:50)?
  2. Israel's journey of "eleven days" became forty years, "a breach of promise" of their own making (Deut. 1:2; Num. 14:34), written "for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come" (1 Cor. 10:11). If the testimony is right that the advent could have come "ere this" (1SM 68.1; 8T 115.5), what "long years" might our own unbelief be adding now — and how do we keep from wandering the wilderness when Canaan is eleven days off?
  3. Scripture says the day of God can be "hasted" by His people (2 Pet. 3:12, margin), tied to a finished work: "this gospel... shall be preached in all the world... and then shall the end come" (Matt. 24:14). If our readiness is a true factor in the timing of the King's return, what does that lay on us this week — and what is the first thing you would have to stop "charging to God" (Ev 696.3) to take up the "longsuffering of our Lord" as "salvation" (2 Pet. 3:15) and your own part in it?

2. The Third Angel in Verity — Righteousness by Faith

The third angel terminates in commandment-AND-faith — Rev. 14:9-12:

  • Rev. 14:9-11. "And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive [his] mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God... And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever." — the solemn warning the third angel carries against the beast, his image, and his mark; the whole weight of v.9-11 lands on the character described in v.12 — the sealed company are the alternative to the mark.
  • Rev. 14:12. "Here is the patience of the saints: here [are] they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus." — the message does NOT terminate in mere law-keeping; it ends in commandment-keeping faith. Law AND the faith of Jesus held together — this fusion IS righteousness by faith.
  • Witness1SM 372.2. White: "Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message, and I have answered, 'It is the third angel's message, in verity.'" — the keystone that NAMES it: righteousness by faith is not a doctrine beside the third angel but the third angel's message "in verity," its very reality. (Review and Herald, April 1, 1890.)
  • WitnessTM 91.2. White: "It presented justification through faith in the Surety; it invited the people to receive the righteousness of Christ, which is made manifest in obedience to all the commandments of God... This is the message that God commanded to be given to the world. It is the third angel's message, which is to be proclaimed with a loud voice, and attended with the outpouring of His Spirit in a large measure." — confirms the fusion exactly as Rev. 14:12: righteousness received by faith is "made manifest in obedience to all the commandments," and this fused message IS the third angel's, carried by the loud cry and the Spirit.

The seed-text: the just shall LIVE by faith — Hab. 2:4; Rom. 1:16-17:

  • Hab. 2:4. "Behold, his soul [which] is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith." — the seed-text of righteousness by faith: the just (righteous) man does not merely begin by faith — he LIVES by it. Self-exaltation ("lifted up") is the opposite; faith is the principle of the righteous life.
  • Rom. 1:16. "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth." — Paul takes up Habakkuk and names it the gospel itself: not a side-doctrine but "the power of God unto salvation."
  • Rom. 1:17. "For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith." — the righteousness OF GOD revealed "from faith to faith." Righteousness by faith is therefore the gospel's whole content, drawn straight out of Habakkuk's seed.

The righteousness received is a Person — Jer. 23:5-6; Gen. 15:6:

  • Jer. 23:5. "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch... and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth." — the righteousness is a Person, the promised Branch, the King.
  • Jer. 23:6. "this [is] his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS." — the righteousness received by faith is Christ Himself, named THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS. To receive righteousness is to receive a Person, not a credit.
  • Gen. 15:6. "And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness." — the pattern from Abraham forward: righteousness is COUNTED (imputed) to the one who believes. Faith, not works, is reckoned for righteousness — the doctrine is older than Sinai, woven into the everlasting covenant.

Righteousness without the law, yet establishing the law — Rom. 3:21-31:

  • Rom. 3:21. "But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets." — the righteousness of God is "without the law" (not earned by law-keeping) yet "witnessed by the law and the prophets" — no contradiction; the law testifies to a righteousness it cannot produce.
  • Rom. 3:22. "Even the righteousness of God [which is] by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference." — it comes "by faith of Jesus Christ" — the very phrase echoed in Rev. 14:12's "the faith of Jesus." The message of the third angel and the gospel of Romans speak one tongue.
  • Rom. 3:24. "Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." — justification is free, by grace, through Christ.
  • Rom. 3:25-26. "Whom God hath set forth [to be] a propitiation through faith in his blood... that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." — the cross shows God both just (the law upheld) and the justifier (the sinner pardoned); it satisfies the law while saving by faith.
  • Rom. 3:28. "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law." — justification is by faith, apart from the deeds of the law; works do not purchase it.
  • Rom. 3:31. "Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." — the hinge that defeats the false charge: faith does NOT make void the law — it ESTABLISHES it. Righteousness by faith and commandment-keeping are not rivals; faith is what truly upholds the law (the exact union of Rev. 14:12).
  • Witness3SM 172.2. White: "The third angel's message is the proclamation of the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus Christ. The commandments of God have been proclaimed, but the faith of Jesus Christ has not been proclaimed by Seventh-day Adventists as of equal importance, the law and the gospel going hand in hand." — names the very deficiency that holds back the harvest: the commandments were proclaimed, but the faith of Jesus was NOT proclaimed as of equal importance — the form kept (law) while the fruit (faith) was neglected. Law and gospel must go hand in hand.

The fruit: peace, and a faith that works — Rom. 5:1; James 2:17-18:

  • Rom. 5:1. "Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." — the fruit of righteousness by faith is peace with God: not anxious law-keeping for acceptance, but reconciliation received, the assurance that frees the believer to obey from love, not fear.
  • James 2:17. "Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone." — living faith works; faith that produces no obedience is dead.
  • James 2:18. "shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works." — this guards the fusion from the other side: as Romans forbids works without faith, James forbids faith without works — the two are one in Rev. 14:12. The country-living obedience is this faith's fruit shown by works (see “Out of the Cities — the Message Refused”).

The seal of the living God — the Father's name written within — Rev. 7:2-3; 14:1; Eph. 4:30:

  • Rev. 7:2-3. "And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God... Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads." — the seal of the living God is set in the FOREHEAD (the seat of mind and choice), and the sealing must FINISH before the four winds are loosed. It marks the servants of God — the same commandment-and-faith company of Rev. 14:12.
    • the seal of the living God = the mark set in the FOREHEAD (mind, choice) on those sealed before the winds are loosed (Rev. 7:2-3); Scripture defines it as the Father's NAME — His character — written in the forehead (Rev. 14:1), an inward work of the Holy Spirit (Eph. 4:30). It is the settling into the truth and the reproduction of Christ's character — righteousness by faith made permanent in the people of Rev. 14:12. The final Sabbath-specific contrast of seal versus mark is drawn out in "The Seal or the Mark — the Final Marked Contrast."
  • Rev. 14:1. "And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty [and] four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads." — Scripture defines the seal: the Father's NAME written in the forehead. In Bible idiom the name is the character (Exo. 34:5-7). To be sealed is to bear the Father's character — righteousness by faith reproduced, the law written within.
  • Eph. 4:30. "And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption." — the sealing is the Spirit's work, holding the believer "unto the day of redemption." To grieve the Spirit is to resist the very agency that seals — the same Spirit whose "large measure" attends the third angel's message (TM 91.2).
  • WitnessLDE 219.4. White: "Just as soon as the people of God are sealed in their foreheads—it is not any seal or mark that can be seen, but a settling into the truth, both intellectually and spiritually, so they cannot be moved—just as soon as God's people are sealed and prepared for the shaking, it will come." — defines the seal as no visible mark but a "settling into the truth" so the faithful cannot be moved: the inward establishment of righteousness by faith in the sealed company. (S.D.A. Bible Commentary 4:1161, 1902.)
  • WitnessLDE 221.1. White: "The seal of the living God will be placed upon those only who bear a likeness to Christ in character." — confirms the Bible definition (Rev. 14:1): only those who bear Christ's character — righteousness by faith reproduced — receive the seal. (S.D.A. Bible Commentary 7:970, 1895.)

The message refused — and the harvest held back — Rev. 14:15:

  • Rev. 14:15. "Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe." — the harvest is reaped only when "ripe." The ripening IS the maturing of the commandment-and-faith people of v.12. To refuse the message that ripens the harvest — or to keep its form without its fruit — is to hold the sickle back.
  • WitnessTM 92.1. White: "The message of the gospel of His grace was to be given to the church in clear and distinct lines, that the world should no longer say that Seventh-day Adventists talk the law, the law, but do not teach or believe Christ." — names the imbalance in concrete terms: the people were known for talking "the law, the law" while failing to teach and believe Christ — the very deficiency righteousness by faith corrects.
  • Witness1SM 234.6. White: "An unwillingness to yield up preconceived opinions, and to accept this truth, lay at the foundation of a large share of the opposition manifested at Minneapolis against the Lord's message through Brethren [E.J.] Waggoner and [A.T.] Jones... The light that is to lighten the whole earth with its glory was resisted, and by the action of our own brethren has been in a great degree kept away from the world." — the historical fact of the refusal: the message of righteousness by faith — the light meant to lighten the whole earth (the loud cry, the ripening of the harvest) — was RESISTED at Minneapolis in 1888 and "in a great degree kept away from the world" by Adventists themselves.
  • WitnessCOL 69.1. White: "'When the fruit is brought forth, immediately he putteth in the sickle, because the harvest is come.' Christ is waiting with longing desire for the manifestation of Himself in His church. When the character of Christ shall be perfectly reproduced in His people, then He will come to claim them as His own." — ties righteousness by faith straight to the harvest of Rev. 14:15: the sickle is thrust in when the fruit — Christ's character reproduced, righteousness by faith matured — is brought forth. To refuse that fruit is to delay the harvest and the coming.
  • WitnessEv 694.3. White: "Had the purpose of God been carried out by His people in giving to the world the message of mercy, Christ would, ere this, have come to the earth, and the saints would have received their welcome into the city of God." — the cost of refusing the ripening message: had the message of mercy (righteousness by faith) been carried out, Christ would already have come. The unfinished harvest is traced to the people's failure — the same verdict that opens this study (see “He Might Have Come — the Delay Was Ours”). (Testimonies vol. 6:450, 1900.)

For Discussion

  1. The third angel's message ends not in commandment-keeping ONLY but in "the commandments of God, AND the faith of Jesus" (Rev. 14:12), and Paul says faith does not make void the law but "establish[es]" it (Rom. 3:31). Where, in your own walk, do you lean toward one side of that fusion — anxious law-keeping without the faith, or claimed faith without the obedience — and what would it look like to hold both as "of equal importance" (3SM 172.2)?
  2. Ellen White wrote that "an unwillingness to yield up preconceived opinions" lay at the root of the opposition at Minneapolis, so that the light "to lighten the whole earth with its glory was resisted... and in a great degree kept away from the world" (1SM 234.6) — and that had the message of mercy been carried out, "Christ would, ere this, have come" (Ev 694.3). What "preconceived opinions" might we still be unwilling to yield, and how does keeping the FORM of the message while neglecting its FRUIT still hold the sickle back today (Rev. 14:15; COL 69.1)?
  3. The seal of the living God is "a settling into the truth... so they cannot be moved" (LDE 219.4), placed only on those who "bear a likeness to Christ in character" (LDE 221.1) — the Father's name written in the forehead (Rev. 14:1). What does it mean, practically, to be "settled into the truth" before the shaking, and how is that different from merely holding correct doctrine?